Field guide

Cultural competence for multicultural campaigns: a field guide

How to tell whether your team is culturally competent enough to run a campaign for CALD audiences, and where competent teams still go wrong.

Cultural competence is the ability to communicate with people from a culture other than your own without losing the meaning, the tone or the trust. In marketing and communications it's a working skill, not a training certificate. You either have it in the room when the brief is written, or you find out you didn't when the campaign lands.

This field guide is for the people who plan and produce communication for Australia's culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities: government communications teams, health promotion officers, brand and marketing managers, agency strategists. It sits alongside The Authenticity Advantage and draws on the same Native Experience (NX) method, but it's written to answer one question. How do you know whether your team is culturally competent enough to run this campaign?

What does cultural competence mean in marketing and communications?

Cultural competence in marketing and communications means your team can plan, write, design and deliver a message so that it lands with a non-English speaking audience the way it would if it had been created in their language and culture from the start. It covers language, but it also covers imagery, humour, hierarchy, timing, channel and the unspoken rules about who's allowed to say what to whom.

The health and community services sectors have used the term for decades, mostly to describe how a clinician or caseworker behaves with a patient. That version matters, but it's not what this guide covers. In a campaign, cultural competence lives upstream. It shows up in who wrote the brief, which communities were consulted before the concept was locked, and whether anyone on the team can tell you why a particular colour or gesture will read differently in Lakemba than it does in Springvale.

Australia's numbers make this a mainstream requirement, not a niche one. 5.5 million people speak a language other than English at home, 22.3% of the population (ABS Census 2021). 852,706 of them reported speaking English not well or not at all. Mandarin, Arabic, Vietnamese, Cantonese and Punjabi lead the list, and Punjabi grew by more than 80% between 2016 and 2021. Every state government department, every primary health network and every bank with a branch in Western Sydney or Melbourne's south-east is already communicating with these communities. The only question is how well.

Why isn't translation the same as cultural competence?

Translation moves words between languages. Cultural competence decides whether those words were worth moving in the first place.

A campaign translated into 12 languages without cultural input is an English campaign in 12 fonts. The headline still assumes an English-speaking reader's frame of reference. The stock photography still shows the wrong families. The call to action still asks people to phone a number during hours they're at work, in a tone that reads as bossy in one language and cold in another.

We see this most often in health communication. A vaccination message built around individual choice and personal risk translates cleanly into Vietnamese, but it misses that the decision in many Vietnamese Australian households is a family one. The words are correct. The message is aimed at the wrong person.

That's the gap cultural competence closes. It's why the Be Authentic chapter treats language as one layer of the Cultural Iceberg, and why LEXIGO's translators are briefed on the audience and the intent before they see the source text.

How do you measure cultural competence in a team?

You can't measure it with a single workshop attendance record. You can measure it through the decisions the team makes at four points in a campaign.

Before the brief. Who decided this audience needed the message, and how? A culturally competent team can name the communities by language, suburb and life stage. "CALD audiences in Victoria" is a category. "Dari and Hazaragi speaking families in Dandenong with children under five" is a brief.

At concept. Who reviewed the creative before it was locked? Not translated. Reviewed. A concept built on a pun, a sporting metaphor or a nuclear-family image needs a cultural read before production, because changing it afterwards costs ten times more.

In production. Are the translators, voice artists and designers working from the intent or from the English artwork? The I.C.E. model in the Be Notable chapter (Intelligence, Curiosity, Empathy) is the shorthand our team uses to check whether the people producing the work understand why it exists.

After launch. Is anyone from the community telling you what happened? Reach numbers from a multilingual media buy tell you the message was seen. They don't tell you it was understood, believed or acted on. The Be Evolving chapter covers what to measure instead.

If your team can answer all four with a named person and a specific action, you're operating with cultural competence. If the answers are "the agency" or "the translator", you're outsourcing it, and you should at least know that's what you're doing.

Where do culturally competent campaigns still go wrong?

Four failure patterns come up repeatedly in the work we review.

Treating a language as a community. Arabic is spoken at home by 367,159 Australians, but a Lebanese Maronite family in Punchbowl and a recently arrived Syrian Muslim family in Fairfield share a script and not much else. Chinese-language communication has the same problem across Mandarin and Cantonese speakers, and again between simplified and traditional script readers.

Consulting after the decision. Community advisory groups asked to react to finished creative can only say yes or no. They can't fix a brief that was wrong from the start. The five-stage co-creation process in the Be Inclusive chapter exists to move that consultation earlier.

Mistaking representation for relevance. Casting a diverse group of faces in an English campaign is inclusive imagery. It isn't multicultural communication. The audience notices when the family on the poster looks like them but the message wasn't written for them.

Assuming bilingual staff are cultural advisers. A bilingual team member can tell you whether a translation reads well. Asking them to sign off on cultural appropriateness for an entire community puts an unfair load on one person and an unearned confidence in the result.

What does a culturally competent brief look like?

A brief that sets a campaign up to succeed with CALD audiences names the following before any creative work starts:

  • The communities, by language and where they live. Suburb or LGA level, using Census data, not a state-wide label.
  • The languages, including script variants and any dialect decisions.
  • The decision-maker in the household or community for this topic, who may not be the person the English brief assumes.
  • The channels these communities use, by name. Community radio, WeChat, Viber groups, faith settings, in-language print. Not "digital and OOH".
  • The cultural advisers or community partners who'll review concept, not just copy, and when.
  • What success looks like in the community's terms, not just in impressions.

The multicultural campaign strategy sections of the Be Trusted chapter go into audience mapping and personas in detail. For the research that answers these questions when the brief can't be written without asking the community first, read multicultural research in Australia. Public sector teams will also want the CALD communications guide, which covers the same ground from the government side.

Where does cultural competence sit in the NX framework?

Native Experience Marketing is built in three phases: Think, Design, Go. Cultural competence isn't a phase. It's the standard every phase is held to. In Think, it determines whether the team understands the audience well enough to set objectives. In Design, it governs who shapes the creative and when the community is in the room. In Go, it decides what you measure and whether you listen to the answer.

The Authenticity Advantage covers the full method. Start with the framework chapter for the model, then Be Notable for building the team, and come back here when you need to check whether the team you've built is ready.